The Shattering of the Muslim Hope in India

A young Muslim reflects on the collapse of constitutional promises and on the everyday fears and dilemmas faced by the minorities.
March 02, 2022
Listen to this article
100% 200%

A few days ago, a friend and I were sitting on my terrace’s moss-blackened floor, having stolen an evening from Delhi life, looking at the fractals of a bare tree against an anaemic sky. He worked in one of those menacingly big MNCs, and was talking about how, as a Muslim, the office felt so alien to him.

“Everybody is so oblivious to the persecution of Muslims. I wake up to a new video of lynching, or another hate speech, or a genocide-enabling cartoon, but I go to office and find people discussing what place makes the best sushis and what place makes the best cheesecakes. There’s Secret Santa happening and there are people chalking out their growth trajectories, and I just look around the office, wondering what this place is, or if I’ve come to a different age,” he said.

But then we worried about other friends who worked in outright communal workspaces, with colleagues needling them every now and then over their religious beliefs, and deduced that even an apathetic space was a privilege. And of course, we shuddered at the thought of what Muslims, especially the ones visibly so, in the informal sector—street vendors, rickshaw-pullers, etc.—might be facing every day.

Being a print journalist who has worked in English newsrooms, I have been largely saved from such experiences. I worked under some truly secular editors, and others, who, I later realised, were secular only because of the prevailing office culture—they turned out to be surprisingly footloose in terms of ideology.

As the skies turned dark and the chatter of kids from the streets below petered out, my friend and I got up to take a walk. The conversation then turned towards what has become the staple of every conversation between young, privileged Muslims: Should we leave India?

There was a time when I believed in the promises of the Indian state, but over the years and many painful reckonings later I began to see it for what it was.

Even as I begin to write my thoughts, I feel a gush of anger, closely followed by an impulse to moderate my expression. This is exerted either by a fear of the law or the anxiety to express an ‘acceptable’ shade of opinion. This is the first mark of control and oppression, for it limits my voice, pre-setting the range of my vocabulary, and, thus, diminishes upon its very birth, the cry for my rights. It is almost incredible how the law and the discourse-setters work together to sanitise testimonies and, subsequently, erode justice.

There was a time when I believed in the promises of the Indian state, but over the years and many painful reckonings later I began to see it for what it was. When it came into being, it was certainly a child with considerable potential. But what it allowed itself to become, a lot of times with wilful transgressions, pausing but never really atoning for its crimes, only suggested that the initial assessments were erroneous and premised perhaps on an unfounded optimism. Despite the progressive Constitution giving it nearly all the thrust it needed to become a secular state, it could never become that. On the contrary, it has now become quite a majoritarian state.

I see and remember ... the faces of the Muslims who have spent their entire youth in prison because of wrongful incarceration.

If there was a metaphor for what the Indian state does to its Muslim citizens, it is that of the police torturing the 23-year-old Faizan during the violence that broke out in Delhi in February 2020. The man is lying on the ground, along with other Muslim men, writhing in pain, and the cops are forcing him to sing the national anthem while prodding him with sticks. Faizan dies later, quite apparently killed by the state. More than two years later, there is not a flower of justice on his grave. Writing in 1962 for The New Yorker, in an essay titled “Letter From a Region in My Mind”, the Black American writer James Baldwin noted, “They had the judges, the juries, the shotguns, the law—in a word, power. But it was criminal power, to be feared, but not respected, and to be outwitted in any way whatever.”

I see and remember the face of Faizan’s mother. I see and remember the horror and the plea for mercy in the eyes of Qutbuddin Ansari from 2002; the tears in the eyes of the lady in Karnataka, who was forced to take off her burqa to enter the school where she had been teaching for years; the faces of the Muslims who have spent their entire youth in prison because of wrongful incarceration; and the pain in the eyes of fellow Muslims, every time I see them raise their hands in supplication.

I also see how the state failed so miserably on the single biggest question of justice for Muslims in independent India—Babri 1992.

From Nellie to Hashimpura, Bhagalpur to Gujarat, I see, and I remember. I see the state’s inaction on Dharam Sansad and Bulli Bai, and its curbs on Friday prayers in Gurgaon, and its hounding of Tablighi Jamat members. I see how the police forces rioted in my alma maters, Aligarh Muslim University and Jamia Millia Islamia, maiming and blinding students, turning spaces that once echoed with life and laughter into haunting reminders of violence and rampage. And I also see how the state failed so miserably on the single biggest question of justice for Muslims in independent India — Babri Masjid in 1992. I felt so cheated when the verdict came.

For me, the Indian judiciary, the supposed sentinel of my rights and freedoms, has been the biggest let down among all the country’s institutions. The pen of the judge moves with great alacrity to sign the bail orders of those who have shot at Muslims, bombed them, and called for a genocide against them, but so rarely to protect Muslims from the state’s or the majority’s harm, or to dispense justice for the atrocities committed against them. And the words spun by the lordships — way of life, preponderance of probabilities, collective conscience — have gone on to become the mainstay of the tall structures that perpetuate injustice and oppression.

In the fullness of time, I began realising how hard I was trying to please, and please whom?

Justice is a basic human need; the lack of it can be so deeply unsettling. The lordships need to realise that it can’t be offered in crumbs here and there; it needs to be absolute and abundant. I, for one, am not big on speedy justice. It can take its own sweet time to arrive, but when it does it should make the heart full. And that is what makes you love a place; you can never truly love a place that doesn’t give you justice. With that realisation, came the explanation to why I had felt so conflicted all these years.

Through NCERT textbooks, through cinema, through newspapers — now though the sophistry that comes in 50-word edits so it is easier to discern — what was reinforced was a notion that this country was a just place. But it was something I did not feel. The whole ecosystem was trying to force me to see something which was not there and that was messing with my head all the time, all through my formative years. Had it been an out and out oppressive framework, I would have seen it sooner. But it was the crumbs that confused me, muddling my thoughts for so long.

The whole elaborate gaslighting effort turned me, like millions of other Muslims, into a person inherently apologetic about my religious identity—trying ever so hard to distinguish myself from the rest of the Muslims, rarely missing a chance to bash mullahs, dressing overly neatly, finding subtle ways to tell people that I came from an educated family, nailing my secular colours to the mast, professing my love for the idea of India so often, and never criticising the BJP without adding a rider that Owaisi was as bad. This constant scrutiny of the self and the worry of how I was being perceived, was, at the very least, tiring.

I do not want to live a life fighting stereotypes erected by the majority, conforming to the template of a ‘good Muslim’ fashioned by them.

In the fullness of time, I began realising how hard I was trying to please. But please whom? The majority, a big chunk of which has clearly endorsed my persecution, electorally, socially, politically. I do not want to live a life fighting stereotypes erected by them, conforming to the template of ‘good Muslim’ fashioned by them, and constantly throwing fellow Muslims under the bus to earn their approval. I even figured that it was not my labour to educate those who came to me with their soft bigotry dressed as innocent questions. If they want their life not to be consumed by hate, they should put in the effort themselves.

Honestly though, I do not care. I do not care about which direction India is headed. I do not want to preach brotherhood or try to salvage the country’s composite culture, as some of the Muslim elite would want me to do. I don’t see any merit in the proposition either. The Muslim bureaucrat and the general and the buzzy author, the new-age zamindars, are all free to try all they want. They have my very best wishes — but I feel the motivation to do that is not born out of a keen understanding of and concern for the community, but from the desire to preserve their own position and cultural estate and their teensy share of state power.

My grandparents and parents might have felt a sense of guilt in demanding equal access to justice, but I do not. I want what is mine by right, and I want it in entirety.

In the decades after Independence, a friend’s grandfather narrated how even ordinary demands by a Muslim in his office were met with a jibe that would be along these lines: Abhi to diya tha Pakistan. Phir aa gaye maangne? ("We just gave you Pakistan. You want something again?") A reductionist, even malafide, reading of Partition fuelled this narrative even in the most liberal spaces. It is this that makes the majority so uneasy when they see an unapologetic Muslim asking for their rights and equal citizenship. My grandparents and parents might have felt a sense of guilt in demanding equal access to justice, but I do not. I want what is mine by right, and I want it in entirety.

Sometimes, just sometimes, I wonder if I should just leave. Will I be running away? What about those who can’t leave? Should I stay and do my bit in the fight? Isn’t the pursuit of security a legitimate pursuit? Friends who have kids worry about the hate their children might face in schools, let alone the kind of country they will grow up to live in. They also think of their parents, who might not be able to go or might not want to go. There are some in their 40s , who say their biggest regret is that they did not leave India when they had the chance.

I just hope that one morning I will wake up to a long and roaring shower of justice.

I want to stay back simply because I belong here. I have lived 30 years of my life here, and it’s only this place that satiates my social appetite. I have seen how painful migrations can be, both forced and voluntary. Everyone I know lives here, my kin, my friends, the people I admire, the people I hate; this is my world. I know how it feels when it’s sunny, I know how it feels when it rains. To uproot myself from here and move to a place where I don’t even know how I’d feel upon waking up, is a frightening thought. I really don’t think I’ll be dazzled by litter-free roads and state-of-the-art drainages. I don’t look at the world through the eyes of a sanitary inspector.

It’s going to be a long night. I don’t know where I’ll wake up. But I just hope that one morning I will wake up to a long and roaring shower of justice.

Register here for a weekly email about new articles; Donate here to support ‘The India Forum’

This article was last updated on March 23, 2022
The India Forum

The India Forum welcomes your comments on this article for the Forum/Letters section.
Write to: editor@theindiaforum.in

Read Also
A new ‘non-vegetarian’ recounts her personal journey to eating animal foods—one that taught her that fish and meat are essential components of food systems and that they are no less ecological and humane than plant foods.
Published On: March 19, 2024 Updated On: March 22, 2024
Those who suffer from rare diseases in India have to navigate a complex and often unsympathetic healthcare system. Their struggles highlight the need for doctors to listen, work together with patients, and show compassion. Without empathy, everyone with an uncommon disease suffers.
Published On: March 19, 2024 Updated On: March 20, 2024
An investigation into Bill Gates’s philanthropic interventions questions the efficacy of his work and asks what gives him the legitimacy to intervene in public policy. It argues that we have become too accepting of his wealth and influence, and we must instead challenge his power.
Published On: March 19, 2024 Updated On: March 22, 2024
Readers Write

Dreaming for justice

Thank you for this article. The author is so right. I dream every night for a shower of justice to wake me up. I must devote every minute and second to do what I can to bring it about.

Renuka Visvanathan

Relatable and a worthwhile read

I went through this wonderful write up by Salik Ahmad. The very fact that an Indian urban Muslim can relate to it has made it a worthwhile read. I am proud to know that he is a fellow alumnus of AMU, a place which has never let its middle name discriminate in imparting knowledge and has treated everyone alike.

Indeed, Muslims in India are at the crossroads, but I feel we aren’t alone in this era of pseudo-nationalism. The rapid inroads Muslim children have made in education in recent years is a pleasant fallout of this persecution and I strongly feel this has the potential to stem the rot. I too belong to a family where religion was best admired inside homes and Insaaniyat always overtook all other forms of existence. My late father always taught us how the extremes of any form have a short shelf life and why moderation is holding the world together.

As we start 2022, a post-Covid world is full of stories that has brought Insaaniyat and moderation back in business and I am sure India will win this battle with pseudo-nationalism and religious bigotry. Muslims must play a central role and if there was ever a time to highlight Islamic teachings, it is now.

We need community outreach and need to thwart any religion-based ideology propagated by our own netas whether it’s Owaisi or anyone else. Today, Indian Muslims need to believe in themselves and their country and not let any negativity surround them. We must contribute in every which way for the benefit of society at large.
Religious borders need to be dismantled earlier than ever. I would love to read more such wonderful write ups in the future.

A hopeful Indian Muslim.

Ramish Aqeel Siddiqui

Shame on us all

The pain expressed by Salik Ahmad should shame us all. We are supposed to be a society that values tolerance and respects diversity. Where has all that gone? What has the political class done to ignite such hatred and prejudice that has turned Muslims into a group of second-class citizens?

The divide has yielded political gains and has created a society of social and economic divisions. Can we fight to reverse this situation?

Samir Jain, Mumbai

Heart-breaking and painful

I don’t have words to describe how full of emotions I am right now. Your words resonate with my emotions. I also wish one day justice will prevail. My identity of a Muslim, that which I am proud, is making others hate me. This is heartbreaking. I wish someday all the hate fades away like it never existed. And we live happily. I love my country and I will never want to be anywhere else.

Madeeha Khan

We all need to speak this truth

The writer has a ringside view to my thoughts and has penned them perfectly. The piece highlights many of the things that sadden, frighten, and disillusion me.

We all need to be able to speak this truth; speak so that maybe, just maybe, one person awakens, even if that person is oneself.

Arshia Ahmed Ayub

With sympathy

All sympathy I am capable of, is for the oppressed. Thank you, Salik Ahmad, for writing this.

Sudhakar Mavilla

Need to look beyond agitational politics

Muslims in Independent India have suffered immensely because of a strong pro-Hindu bias, which exhibited itself in excessive police violence against them during riots even during the Congress regimes. Since the 1980s prejudice and suspicion against Muslims has further deepened due to the appeasement policies of the Congress government, and the role played by Muslim political leaders and clergy in those years. Such policies helped the BJP to exploit Hindu fears for political gain, and after coming to power the BJP has openly promoted hatred against Muslims, reducing them almost to the status of second-class citizens. For the BJP, Muslims are non-voters, and hence their concerns cannot only be ignored, but deliberately hitting at their interests occasionally (Art. 370, CAA, anti-conversion laws) is considered electorally rewarding.

How do Muslims fight against injustice? The path of agitational politics, so effective in a liberal democracy, is not likely to benefit Muslims as long as hatred against them dominates the Hindu mind. With a widening gulf between the two communities, any agitation by Muslims against discrimination can arouse the very emotions amongst Hindus that foster discrimination and it is therefore self-defeating.

This leaves little choice for Muslims, except to look within and achieve success on merit, rather than agitate for group rights. Luckily, there is no overt discrimination against them in education and recruitment to government jobs, and therefore Muslims should aspire not only to increase their share in elite professions, but also to improve their image, which would happen if in the next 20 years Muslims were among the best doctors, teachers and administrators in the country. They need a mass movement in which basic thrust should be on the qualitative aspect of education.

Naresh Saxena

Sign up for The India Forum Updates

Get new articles delivered to your inbox every Friday as soon as fresh articles are published.

 
 

The India Forum seeks your support...

to sustain its effort to deliver thoughtful analysis and commentary that is without noise, abuse and fake news.

HOW MUCH?
HOW OFTEN?
You can donate any amount of your choice either once, every month or every year.